We have already remarked on Terry's remarkable ability to attract new friends, alienate old voters and generally be fucking rude to everybody who doesn't fawn over his illiterate bleatings (I'll leave Will to comment on Frank at some point, but he has already written about the yawning gap between what Terry says regarding discrimination and what he and organisations he influences do.)
I must admit that Kay started off on the wrong foot - being outright rude to the egregious cunt. It normally takes people one or two postings before the blind red mists of seething rage overtake them and their vocabulary descends to the Anglo-Saxon. We'll forgive her (as if she needed our forgiveness, but that's not the point) as she is a constituent of his so has every reason to already be furious with the clueless twat. However, she has made a partial recovery and is making the beginner's mistake of trying to reason with him in his comments column. We have all tried that (except Shotgun, who was always just rude to the fuckwit) and failed to get relevant and informative responses, even when he published our comments, which are among the main reasons we set this site up.
Let's have a look at his latest drivelling ...
Kay: I have supplied a link highlighting you being exposed as a liar. If (you) are prepared to lie about something so easy to disprove why should we believe anything else you say?
Seems a reasonable question to me. We have caught you saying something incorrect (admittedly the link was to this site but people have provided onwards links as well). It is either an error, a mistake (honest or otherwise) or a lie. She believes it is a lie. I agree with her. What did Terry say?
Tel: Just say what you are getting at and I'll reply.
She did, you cockroach-brained oxygen thief. Still, missing some because I do have real work to do ...
Kay: You do own shares and you have profited from Thatcher's council house sell off. Or are you trying to tell us that you openly supported this policy when it was introduced. You also own share in a privatised utility. Did you also openly support this privatisation when it was introduced. This makes you a hypocrite and you know it, hence why you keep evading the question?
Tel: There is one point in this drivel which is true but you don't understand that properly either. Go and do some work and get proof of what you say, otherwise it's just name calling.
You fucking shit-faced bag of rancid lard. Answer her perfectly reasonable questions. We have asked you as well and you have pathetically refused to respond (except with insults.) And she made three points there - only one of which, the one about hypocrisy, is not a simple statement of fact. Learn to fucking count before you give me apoplexy, you utter, utter waste of a skin.
- You own shares in Transco, according to your statement of Councillor's Interests. (Actually you don't, you mendacious dim-wit, Transco are an operating company of National Grid plc, in whom you may, or may not own some shares. Fix your fucking statement, it's a legal requirement to get it correct.) We have asked why you have these. We want to know the truth. Did you apply for them at privatisation? If so, what is your record of political statements regarding privatisation? Did you get them as part of a worker incentive scheme? If so, please give us some information regarding your work history and responsibilities.
- You apparently live in an ex-council house. Let us know if we are wrong about this. If not, did you buy it from the council yourself? In which case, the saga that has led to this and your slander of Iain Hogg make you a hypocrite.
S-E
1 comments:
"I'll leave Will to comment on Frank at some point"
There are three possibilities:
1. Frank was sloshed.
2. Frank was being sarcastic.
3. Frank has actually found out what Terry does for LGBT rights in which case he's a miracle worker as Terry won't tell me. Perhaps Frank will spread the word.
Post a Comment