I have been banned from Terry’s comments for some time because I reported (accurately) that his fellow Labour councillors were claiming his absence from full meetings of the council were an attempt at undermining the group leader.
The other day he launched into a gratuitous personal attack against me (probably motivated by my touching a nerve about his support of Glasgow Celtic). I expected that he would allow me a right to reply on his site. But it appears that as of this time he has not had the common decency to publish it and defend himself. This is the act of a coward who probably now regrets launching into this diatribe having read the small print beneath the latest graphics and realised it was Shotgun and not myself who published them.
What a horrible, small, nasty man who has to look himself in the mirror every day. Right now I do feel sorry for him.
PS: I had the foresight to publish my reply on my own site.
6 comments:
I have also had a recent sock puppet comment banned - in response to where he claims to have forgotten to vote for the fragrant Wendy:
"You FORGOT! What else have you forgotten to do? Forgotten to attend council meetings, forgotten to attend conference?
Hopefully by the time the next election rolls around, the electorate will remember what a useless sack of shit you really are and put their crosses next to one of your opponenents"
Perhaps, in addition to diabetes, Terry is suffering from early onset Alzheimers.
It is very strange talking about myself in the third person through the various obvious sock puppets he still lets me post with.
Further to the sock puppet thing, does June = Clairwil?
Do you know who June is? It is just that my mum has a few friends named June and I know they read my work. I have had to restrain my mother from going into bat for me a couple of times as she would be a bit to vicious and it would be a breach of the articles of war ;)
It's you isn't it Shotgun? You sly dog you.
Shotgun, there are those in the "building trade" who know only too well how to work and scrounge benefits. Particularly those with bad backs.
Does the FOI stretch to cover information on benefit claimants?
Post a Comment